ICBEN 4 2020: Survey Questionnaire Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.Name (optional)FirstLastEmail (optional)You might choose to remain anonymous.A. Participation: you participated as (select all that apply)a speaker or an authoran attendee (not an author or a speaker)an organizing committee memberB. Would you recommend this conference to others in the future?YesNoC. Which types of sessions did you attend? (select all that apply)Opening and/or Closing (A, or T)General Plenaries (B, F, K, or R)Expert Plenaries (C or Q)Expert Sessions (D, G, I, L, N, or O)General Sessions (E, J, or M)Cultural Programs (H or P)Strategy Session (S)Section D: Your AssessmentD1. Please rate your overall impression of the event.PoorFairGoodVery GoodExcellentNot ApplicableD2. Impact: Please rate the conference in terms of adding to your knowledge and understanding about the environmental challenges faced by Bangladesh.PoorFairGoodVery GoodExcellentNot ApplicableD3. Please tell us about the likelihood of your use of the information gathered at this conference.PoorFairGoodVery GoodExcellentNot ApplicableD4. Please rate the quality of the talks you attended at this conference.PoorFairGoodVery GoodExcellentNot ApplicableD5. Please rate the quality of moderation of the session(s) you spoke in.PoorFairGoodVery GoodExcellentNot ApplicableD6. Please rate the quality of moderation of the sessions you attended but were not an author or a speaker.PoorFairGoodVery GoodExcellentNot ApplicableD7. Please tell us about the adequacy of the communications from the conference organizers.PoorFairGoodVery GoodExcellentNot ApplicableD8. Please rate the quality of the logistics (internet connections, Zoom links, etc.) at this conference.PoorFairGoodVery GoodExcellentNot ApplicableD9. Please assess the quality of the program document published on the occasion of this conference. PoorFairGoodVery GoodExcellentNot ApplicableD10. What do you think about the publication quality of the volume printed with conference abstracts? PoorFairGoodVery GoodExcellentNot ApplicableD11. What is your opinion on the duration of the conference (2.5 days)?PoorFairGoodVery GoodExcellentNot ApplicableD12. Please rate the diversity, richness and relevance of topics covered at the conferencePoorFairGoodVery GoodExcellentNot ApplicableD13. What do you think about the the length of time allocated at the end of the sessions for open discussion?PoorFairGoodVery GoodExcelllentNot ApplicableD14. Please rate the opportunities provided at the conference for networking and/or interaction with other attendees.PoorFairGoodVery GoodExcellentNot ApplicableD15. Please provide general comments/feedback about the conference if you have any.Section E: Suggestions for Future ConferencesE1. What is your recommendation for the format of post-pandemic BEN conferences.Continue the online-only modeReturn to in-person modeUse a mixed mode: online and in-personE2. Do you have any comments or suggestions to improve the conference? Thank you!Submit Share this:Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)Click to print (Opens in new window)
